For Christmas I received a fascinating present from a good friend - my really own "best-selling" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (fantastic title) bears my name and my image on its cover, and it has glowing reviews.

Yet it was entirely composed by AI, with a few simple triggers about me provided by my good friend Janet.

It's an intriguing read, and really amusing in parts. But it also meanders quite a lot, and is somewhere between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It mimics my chatty style of composing, however it's likewise a bit repetitive, and really verbose. It might have gone beyond Janet's prompts in collating information about me.

Several sentences begin "as a leading innovation journalist ..." - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.

There's also a mysterious, repeated hallucination in the kind of my cat (I have no family pets). And there's a metaphor on nearly every page - some more random than others.

There are lots of business online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from .

When I got in touch with the chief executive Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he informed me he had actually offered around 150,000 personalised books, library.kemu.ac.ke primarily in the US, since pivoting from compiling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The company utilizes its own AI tools to create them, based on an open source big language design.

I'm not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can't - only Janet, who developed it, can order any more copies.

There is presently no barrier to anyone developing one in anybody's name, including celebs - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around abusive content. Each book consists of a printed disclaimer specifying that it is imaginary, produced by AI, and designed "entirely to bring humour and happiness".

Legally, the copyright belongs to the company, but Mr Mashiach stresses that the item is intended as a "customised gag gift", and the books do not get sold even more.

He wishes to widen his range, creating various genres such as sci-fi, and maybe offering an autobiography service. It's designed to be a light-hearted kind of consumer AI - selling AI-generated products to human customers.

It's likewise a bit terrifying if, like me, you write for a living. Not least due to the fact that it most likely took less than a minute to create, and it does, definitely in some parts, sound much like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and stars worldwide have actually expressed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then produce similar content based upon it.

"We need to be clear, when we are talking about data here, we really imply human developers' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, founder of Fairly Trained, which projects for AI firms to regard creators' rights.

"This is books, this is articles, this is images. It's artworks. It's records ... The whole point of AI training is to learn how to do something and after that do more like that."

In 2023 a song featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms due to the fact that it was not their work and they had not granted it. It didn't stop the track's developer trying to nominate it for a Grammy award. And despite the fact that the artists were fake, it was still extremely popular.

"I do not believe the use of generative AI for imaginative purposes must be banned, but I do think that generative AI for these functions that is trained on individuals's work without authorization should be banned," Mr Newton Rex includes. "AI can be really powerful however let's develop it ethically and fairly."

OpenAI says Chinese competitors using its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes market and damages America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have actually picked to block AI designers from trawling their online content for training functions. Others have actually chosen to collaborate - the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for example.

The UK federal government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would permit AI developers to use developers' content on the web to assist develop their designs, unless the rights holders pull out.

Ed Newton Rex explains this as "insanity".

He points out that AI can make advances in areas like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, journalists and artists.

"All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and messing up the incomes of the nation's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in the House of Lords, is also strongly against getting rid of copyright law for AI.

"Creative industries are wealth developers, 2.4 million tasks and an entire lot of pleasure," says the Baroness, who is likewise a consultant to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The federal government is undermining among its finest carrying out markets on the unclear guarantee of development."

A federal government spokesperson said: "No move will be made till we are definitely positive we have a practical plan that delivers each of our objectives: increased control for ideal holders to help them license their material, access to premium product to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more openness for best holders from AI designers."

Under the UK federal government's new AI strategy, a national information library containing public data from a wide variety of sources will likewise be offered to AI scientists.

In the US the future of federal rules to manage AI is now up in the air following President Trump's go back to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to enhance the safety of AI with, to name a few things, firms in the sector required to share details of the functions of their systems with the US government before they are released.

But this has actually now been reversed by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do instead, however he is stated to desire the AI sector to deal with less regulation.

This comes as a number of claims versus AI companies, and particularly versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have been secured by everybody from the New york city Times to authors, music labels, and even a comedian.

They declare that the AI firms broke the law when they took their content from the internet without their permission, and used it to train their systems.

The AI companies argue that their actions fall under "fair usage" and are for that reason exempt. There are a number of factors which can constitute reasonable usage - it's not a straight-forward definition. But the AI sector is under increasing analysis over how it collects training data and wiki.myamens.com whether it should be paying for it.

If this wasn't all enough to ponder, Chinese AI company DeepSeek has shaken the sector over the past week. It became one of the most downloaded free app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek claims that it established its technology for a fraction of the price of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has raised security concerns in the US, and threatens American's present dominance of the sector.

As for me and a profession as an author, I think that at the minute, if I truly want a "bestseller" I'll still need to compose it myself. If anything, it-viking.ch Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the existing weak point in generative AI tools for larger projects. It is full of inaccuracies and hallucinations, and it can be quite difficult to read in parts due to the fact that it's so long-winded.

But offered how quickly the tech is evolving, I'm uncertain how long I can stay confident that my significantly slower human writing and editing skills, are much better.

Register for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the most significant advancements in global innovation, with analysis from BBC correspondents around the world.

Outside the UK? Sign up here.